top of page
About
Principles
History
Internships and Fellowships
Contact
Frank Fund Scholarship -
Stay Informed
Programs
Democracy and World Organization
The Federal Paradigm
Existential Risks and Planetary Policy
The Extended Transatlantic System
Publications
Blog Posts and Commentary
Books by Board Members
Publications by Affiliated Members
People
The Team
Board of Directors
Advisory Board
Alumni
Donate
Cancun and the Transatlantic Community Plus
Dec 14, 2010
2 min read
By Griffin W. Huschke, Mayme and Herb Frank Research Fellow
It seems that reading about failures of the annual UN Conference on Climate Change has become a regular December tradition like ugly holiday sweaters , but there’s a lot t o like about Friday’s agreement from Cancun, Mexico. Sure, negotiators didn’t come to a concrete agreement, but the conference wasn’t a total embarrassment f or world leaders, and international a greements on the environment usually need a running start. You gotta have the Vienna Convention bef ore the Montreal Protocol, an d COP 16 is movin g negotiators in the right direction. And a major reason the negotiations moved anywhere is because of the determination of Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa, whose possibly divine diplo matic wrangling helped pass the agreement just before time expired.
Indeed, Secretary Espinosa’s determination to broker a deal at last week’s meetings is a great example of why transatlantic countries need to cooperate with nations outside the community. Transatlantic influence at these talks is pretty small because the COP meetings rely on consensus, and one state with an axe to grind can derail the entire process. Also, the major stumbling block at past negotiations has been discord between rich and poor countries. The Atlantic community is composed of wealthy states, and biased in the eyes of poorer countries, which see attempts to cap carbon emissions as the West undermining their economic growth.
In order to broker a fair compromise, transatlantic nations need neutral countries like Mexico to negotiate between developed and developing states. Atlantic democracies weren’t much help when Bolivia tried to sabotage the agreement in the 11th hour, and we’ve seen what happens when the transatlantic community tires deal with developing countries without an intermediary. But when the community agreed to work with Mexican Foreign Secretary Espinosa, they brokered an agreement that both rich and poor countries could agree on.
Yet, the need for greater cooperation among non-transatlantic countries doesn’t apply to just climate change. There was a big push at last month’s NATO summit to deepen ties with coun tries outside of the alliance, and we’ve seen a si milar move with the expansion of the G-8. The transatlantic community is taking a more global view of security, finance, and climate change, and we’ve seen with this latest agreement that this process can yield more effective international agreements.
COP 17 (they grow up so fast!) will be held in Durban, South Africa, next December, and is certain to disappoint somebody. But hopefully with greater cooperation between transatlantic democracies and developing countries, the process will continue to move forward. And we can always look forward to some pretty interesting pr otests .
World Organization
International Order